Thread:Rahlzel/@comment-5030775-20150319140020/@comment-2138856-20150319235352

If you'd like to make Template:Infobox Node, you're more than welcome. But as it stands, I don't see any logic to it. In fact, there are more disadvantages than advantages in my mind to having a whole new template just for one thing when an infobox already exists that can handle it. "Think smarter, not harder."
 * 1) What matters is what the users see. If the data can be shown accurately in Template:MagicBeans, then it works.
 * 2) All that would need to be added is "Drops" as a new field and "Harvesting Node" as the type. "Biomes" would cover locations.
 * 3) Less templates means that if we want to change something about a template, that change doesn't need to be applied to all the different templates we have.