Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-38781964-20190403220333/@comment-38781964-20190404145652

Tueman wrote: Perhaps you have different standards than we do. Obviously if an edit is straight up vandalism then you should undo it. However, the admins and mods make the final decision; it is frustrating when you repeatedly undo our edits despite multiple of us warning you not to. Warning? please, now ik why that other dude got so mad at you because you never warn anyone of anything you never say to "stop making [part of warning here (if u quote me)]" you don't warn you just...do. (note: i am not trying to be rude i am just letting u know)

Jamintheinfinite wrote: We admins and mods don't live in a one time zone and we are also busy. We can't moderate this wiki 24/7, but we do moderate it the best we can and when we are able to. Even then, some people who aren't mods help us out to undo those bad edits when we're unavailable there should be enough admins/mods that it IS being covered 24/7, since i am the only one on this entire wiki who follows the Guidlies TO THE LETTER ik exactly, well, how this wiki should be run
 * 1) when someone makes a bad edit they should be notified of their mistake
 * 2) make sure to give them at least two warnings that if they keep going they'll be blocked if they continue after you already notified them of their first mistake, and don't really seem to care about what you said er whatever
 * 3) when blocking them give them a notification of the block and why
 * 4) and then well, you get the idea