Thread:LeonTheDoge/@comment-28208230-20160513140036/@comment-26996876-20160513145518

Retro Gamer Dad wrote: Re: player vs. user. In general usage, yes. But this wiki has a page called player, which is written about the in-game character. Therefore, we need to be certain any reference to the player equals that character, and need to use a different term when referring to the one playing the game. Alternatively, we can rename the player page. Maybe something like "the diver" or "the survivor." Either approach will work, as long as we are clear and consistent.

Re: the stalker page. I wasn't shortening just for the sake of making it shorter. My edit had all the same information, but in stronger, more efficient language. I don't see anything unreadable or potentitally confusing about it. For some examples: 1) the things on the stalker's back are plates. They are not spikes. Think stegasauraus. 2) it is better to specify exactly the range of back that has the plates. Thus, neck to tail is better than "most of the body's length." 3) We shouldn't say "seemingly smooth skin." Of course it appears to be smooth, this is the appearance section! Since it's not a real life object we can touch, just call it like what we see. It's smooth. In this format, we should be direct and authoritative, not vague and uncertain.

I am perfectly willing to discuss the readability of my efforts. To just discard them out of hand is rude. You can always rename pages, and I personally think that "The Survivor" would be a good name for a change.

As for the Stalker page, I'll try to accomodate my editing to your desire.